We recently looked at OSC around the time that Cham Sys added it to the MagicQ range. These options all use show control systems such as MSC, MIDI or OSC to fire a compatible lighting desk. ![]() We had much fewer options regarding the control of stage lighting systems. Prior to the release of QLab 4, we had many options for audio, video and show control cueing using QLab. It’s worth reflecting on the huge gear change that came with QLab 3, something that left users wondering what the upcoming QLab 4 release could possibly do to match the level of innovation that hit with the release of version 3. The leaps in functionality came in many areas, but video playback and manipulation complemented the other tools in audio and show control. Just when we were all bumbling along happily with QLab 2, version 3 appeared and hit us like a strangely pleasant baseball bat to the face. QLab 2 came with significant developments that made the product seem a lot more complete and ‘finished’. QLab has always enjoyed a high level of user interest in its development, a positive feedback loop that the team at Figure 53 has managed well. What Chris Ashworth and Figure 53 have always given us with QLab is possibility, not only in current incarnations but also scope for the future. Looking back QLab 1 was a functional playback tool for digital media that now seems quite raw. If you have been around for long enough to remember the release of previous QLab versions, you’ll have a handle on the development history. On Stage Lighting looks at the new lighting control capabilities of QLab 4 and considers future developments. Users do not have the ability to direct message each other or block others - at least not yet.So, the much anticipated QLab 4 has arrived and with it a new branch of functionality that may or may not have caught you by surprise. ![]() The look and feel is nearly identical to Twitter, and people’s feeds are already filled with memes and jokes. The platform allows users to post text and images to a central feed, follow other users, and repost (similar to a retweet). “We’ve now designed and built a system that we think achieves the goals stated above.” “People have been saying for years that it would be great if users could own their data and their relationships if we could have transparent algorithms and algorithmic choice if there could be more accountability and user control over how social platforms are moderated,” Graber wrote in a blog post last month. That means user data can be stored on independent servers rather than ones owned by the company, and that in the future, users will be able to develop their own servers that they can use with communities of their choosing. The platform clarified its relationship to Twitter in a lengthy thread in April 2022, where it noted that former Twitter software engineer Jay Graber was also brought on to help launch the new platform.Īlthough the Bluesky app has many similarities to Twitter, its key difference is that it is organized around a decentralized system. ![]() Dorsey, who co-founded Twitter in 2006 and stepped down as chief executive in 2021, now serves on the board for Bluesky.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |